Who is mindless behavior dating
To live, any organism must have a source of energy (for example, food).
This energy is utilized for two purposes: mere maintenance and work.
The appearance of atomic energy has led some to question this assumption.
However, given an infinite source of energy, population growth still produces an inescapable problem. The arithmetic signs in the analysis are, as it were, reversed; but Bentham's goal is still unobtainable.
It is easy to show that the class is not a null class. Consider the problem, "How can I win the game of tick-tack-toe?
My thesis is that the "population problem," as conventionally conceived, is a member of this class.
How it is conventionally conceived needs some comment.
Specifically, can Bentham's goal of "the greatest good for the greatest number" be realized? This was clearly stated by von Neumann and Morgenstern (3), but the principle is implicit in the theory of partial differential equations, dating back at least to D'Alembert (1717-1783).
The second reason springs directly from biological facts.No gourmet meals, no vacations, no sports, no music, no literature, no art ...